CR&S VUN Underpowered vs Norton C 652 Combat (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the CR&S VUN Underpoweredstacks up against the Norton C 652 Combat. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | CR&S VUN Underpowered | Norton C 652 Combat |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2001 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 652 cc | 652 cc |
| Horsepower | 29 hp | 50 hp |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Weight | 135 kg | 158 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.7 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-ZRX17 / 160/60-ZRX17 | 110/70-R17 / 160/60-R17 |
CR&S VUN Underpowered vs Norton C 652 Combat — which should you buy?
Picking between the CR&S VUN Underpowered and the Norton C 652 Combat usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the CR&S VUN Underpowered brings 29 hp in a 135 kg package, while the Norton C 652 Combat counters with 50 hp at 158 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: