Demak DTM 150 Combat vs UM DSF 159 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Demak DTM 150 Combatstacks up against the UM DSF 159. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Demak DTM 150 Combat | UM DSF 159 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 150 cc |
| Weight | 149 kg | 122 kg |
| Seat height | — | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.00-18 / 3.50-18 | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 |
Demak DTM 150 Combat vs UM DSF 159 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Demak DTM 150 Combat and the UM DSF 159 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Demak DTM 150 Combat brings its published horsepower in a 149 kg package, while the UM DSF 159 counters with its own power figure at 122 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: