E-Ton Vector ST 300 vs Barossa APO 300 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the E-Ton Vector ST 300stacks up against the Barossa APO 300. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | E-Ton Vector ST 300 | Barossa APO 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 287 cc | 288 cc |
| Weight | 225 kg | 199 kg |
| Seat height | 35 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Double disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 21/7-10 / 22/10-10 | 21/7-10 / 21/10-8 |
E-Ton Vector ST 300 vs Barossa APO 300 — which should you buy?
Picking between the E-Ton Vector ST 300 and the Barossa APO 300 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the E-Ton Vector ST 300 brings its published horsepower in a 225 kg package, while the Barossa APO 300 counters with its own power figure at 199 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: