Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2 vs Rieju SMX Pro 50 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2stacks up against the Rieju SMX Pro 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2 | Rieju SMX Pro 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 82 kg | 97 kg |
| Seat height | — | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 2.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. AJP | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 100/80-17 / 130/70-18 | 100/80-17 / 130/70-17 |
Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2 vs Rieju SMX Pro 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2 and the Rieju SMX Pro 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Factory Bike Chrono SM50-2 brings its published horsepower in a 82 kg package, while the Rieju SMX Pro 50 counters with its own power figure at 97 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: