Factory Bike Chrono SM50 vs Rieju Tango 50 SM (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Factory Bike Chrono SM50stacks up against the Rieju Tango 50 SM. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Factory Bike Chrono SM50 | Rieju Tango 50 SM |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 80 kg | 101 kg |
| Seat height | — | 33 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. AJP double piston | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Single piston | Single disc |
| Tires | 100/80-17 / 130/70-18 | — |
Factory Bike Chrono SM50 vs Rieju Tango 50 SM — which should you buy?
Picking between the Factory Bike Chrono SM50 and the Rieju Tango 50 SM usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Factory Bike Chrono SM50 brings its published horsepower in a 80 kg package, while the Rieju Tango 50 SM counters with its own power figure at 101 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: