Factory Bike Phantom R14 Agua vs Lem CXF 3 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Factory Bike Phantom R14 Aguastacks up against the Lem CXF 3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Factory Bike Phantom R14 Agua | Lem CXF 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2006 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 4 hp |
| Weight | 43 kg | 45 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-14 / 3.00-12 | 2.50-10 / 2.75-10 |
Factory Bike Phantom R14 Agua vs Lem CXF 3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Factory Bike Phantom R14 Agua and the Lem CXF 3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Factory Bike Phantom R14 Agua brings its published horsepower in a 43 kg package, while the Lem CXF 3 counters with 4 hp at 45 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: