Fantic Caballero 50M Performance vs Husqvarna SM50 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Fantic Caballero 50M Performancestacks up against the Husqvarna SM50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Fantic Caballero 50M Performance | Husqvarna SM50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 85 kg | 43 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 27 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 0.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Wave disc | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control |
| Tires | 100/80-17 / 130/70-17 | 90/90-10 / 90/90-10 |
Fantic Caballero 50M Performance vs Husqvarna SM50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Fantic Caballero 50M Performance and the Husqvarna SM50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Fantic Caballero 50M Performance brings its published horsepower in a 85 kg package, while the Husqvarna SM50 counters with its own power figure at 43 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: