Generic Trigger 50 SM One vs Puma Falcon CR50 Motard (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Generic Trigger 50 SM Onestacks up against the Puma Falcon CR50 Motard. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Generic Trigger 50 SM One | Puma Falcon CR50 Motard |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 96 kg | 107 kg |
| Seat height | — | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.6 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/80-17 / 130/80-17 | 110/70-17 / 140/70-17 |
Generic Trigger 50 SM One vs Puma Falcon CR50 Motard — which should you buy?
Picking between the Generic Trigger 50 SM One and the Puma Falcon CR50 Motard usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Generic Trigger 50 SM One brings 2 hp in a 96 kg package, while the Puma Falcon CR50 Motard counters with 4 hp at 107 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: