Generic Vertigo 50 vs MBK Booster 13-inch Naked (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Generic Vertigo 50stacks up against the MBK Booster 13-inch Naked. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Generic Vertigo 50 | MBK Booster 13-inch Naked |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | — | 75 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 90/90-12 / 100/90-10 | 120/70-13 / 130/70-13 |
Generic Vertigo 50 vs MBK Booster 13-inch Naked — which should you buy?
Picking between the Generic Vertigo 50 and the MBK Booster 13-inch Naked usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Generic Vertigo 50 brings 4 hp, while the MBK Booster 13-inch Naked counters with 3 hp at 75 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: