Generic XOR 50 AT and T Williams vs MBK Stunt Naked (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Generic XOR 50 AT and T Williamsstacks up against the MBK Stunt Naked. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Generic XOR 50 AT and T Williams | MBK Stunt Naked |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 92 kg | 267 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.1 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | — | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | — | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/80-12 / 130/90-10 |
Generic XOR 50 AT and T Williams vs MBK Stunt Naked — which should you buy?
Picking between the Generic XOR 50 AT and T Williams and the MBK Stunt Naked usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Generic XOR 50 AT and T Williams brings 2 hp in a 92 kg package, while the MBK Stunt Naked counters with 4 hp at 267 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: