Giantco Bud vs Qlink Travis 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Giantco Budstacks up against the Qlink Travis 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Giantco Bud | Qlink Travis 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 82 kg | 95 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 1.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. Optional drum |
| Tires | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 | 100/80-16 / 100/80-14 |
Giantco Bud vs Qlink Travis 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Giantco Bud and the Qlink Travis 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Giantco Bud brings 3 hp in a 82 kg package, while the Qlink Travis 50 counters with 4 hp at 95 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: