Giantco MPS vs Keeway Hacker 50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Giantco MPSstacks up against the Keeway Hacker 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Giantco MPS | Keeway Hacker 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | — |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 103 kg | 115 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 6.0 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Giantco MPS vs Keeway Hacker 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Giantco MPS and the Keeway Hacker 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Giantco MPS brings 2 hp in a 103 kg package, while the Keeway Hacker 50 counters with its own power figure at 115 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: