Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli vs Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncellistacks up against the Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli | Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | — |
| Weight | — | 95 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 220 mm stainless steel disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 175 mm stainless steel disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-14 / 140/60-13 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli vs Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD — which should you buy?
Picking between the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli and the Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Gilera Runner 50 SP Simoncelli brings 5 hp, while the Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD counters with 4 hp at 95 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: