Gilera Runner SP 50 vs Kymco Super 8 50 4T (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Gilera Runner SP 50stacks up against the Kymco Super 8 50 4T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Gilera Runner SP 50 | Kymco Super 8 50 4T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | — |
| Weight | — | 108 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 220 mm stainless steel disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 175 mm stainless steel disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-14 / 140/60-13 | 100/80-14 / 120/80-14 |
Gilera Runner SP 50 vs Kymco Super 8 50 4T — which should you buy?
Picking between the Gilera Runner SP 50 and the Kymco Super 8 50 4T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Gilera Runner SP 50 brings 4 hp, while the Kymco Super 8 50 4T counters with 3 hp at 108 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: