Harley-Davidson Softail Blackline vs Redneck Bad Ass Bagger (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Harley-Davidson Softail Blacklinestacks up against the Redneck Bad Ass Bagger. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Harley-Davidson Softail Blackline | Redneck Bad Ass Bagger |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2012 |
| Price | $15,599 | — |
| Engine | 1688 cc | 1688 cc |
| Torque | 134 Nm | — |
| Weight | 294 kg | — |
| Seat height | 24 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 5.0 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. 4-piston | Single disc. HHI |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. 2-piston | Single disc. HHI |
| Tires | MH90-21 / 200/55-R17 | 80/90-21 / 300-18 |
Harley-Davidson Softail Blackline vs Redneck Bad Ass Bagger — which should you buy?
Picking between the Harley-Davidson Softail Blackline and the Redneck Bad Ass Bagger usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Harley-Davidson Softail Blackline brings its published horsepower in a 294 kg package, while the Redneck Bad Ass Bagger counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: