Harley Davidson Softail® Low Rider® ST vs Exile Cycles Fat Tracker (2026)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Harley Davidson Softail® Low Rider® STstacks up against the Exile Cycles Fat Tracker. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Harley Davidson Softail® Low Rider® ST | Exile Cycles Fat Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2026 | 2012 |
| Price | $23,999 | $55,000 |
| Engine | 1923 cc | 1983 cc |
| Weight | 311 kg | — |
| Seat height | 715 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 18.0 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Manual, 6 speed, Belt | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Dual Hydraulic Disc | Single disc. Exile front brake caliper, 4-piston, |
| Rear brakes | Hydraulic Disc | Single disc. Exile brake rotor, 11.5´, stainless steel |
| Tires | Michelin® Scorcher® 31 110/90 R19 62H / Michelin® Scorcher® 31 180/70 R16 77H | 200/70-15 / 230/55-15 |
Harley Davidson Softail® Low Rider® ST vs Exile Cycles Fat Tracker — which should you buy?
Picking between the Harley Davidson Softail® Low Rider® ST and the Exile Cycles Fat Tracker usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Harley Davidson Softail® Low Rider® ST brings its published horsepower in a 311 kg package, while the Exile Cycles Fat Tracker counters with its own power figure. On price, the Harley Davidson Softail® Low Rider® ST has the lower MSRP.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: