Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect) vs Beta Evo 200 2T (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect)stacks up against the Beta Evo 200 2T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect) | Beta Evo 200 2T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1986 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 194 cc | 195 cc |
| Horsepower | 10 hp | — |
| Weight | — | 66 kg |
| Seat height | — | 26 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.9 L | 0.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc. 4 piston caliper |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc. 2 piston caliper |
| Tires | 3.00-17 / 3.50-16 | 2.75-21 / 4.00-18 |
Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect) vs Beta Evo 200 2T — which should you buy?
Picking between the Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect) and the Beta Evo 200 2T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Honda CM 200 T (reduced effect) brings 10 hp, while the Beta Evo 200 2T counters with its own power figure at 66 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: