Honda CM 250 C vs MuZ ETZ 251 (reduced effect) (1991)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Honda CM 250 Cstacks up against the MuZ ETZ 251 (reduced effect). Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Honda CM 250 C | MuZ ETZ 251 (reduced effect) |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1984 | 1991 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 234 cc | 243 cc |
| Horsepower | 17 hp | 17 hp |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | 4.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Expanding brake |
| Tires | 3.25-18 / 110/90-16 | 2.75-18 / 110/80-16 |
Honda CM 250 C vs MuZ ETZ 251 (reduced effect) — which should you buy?
Picking between the Honda CM 250 C and the MuZ ETZ 251 (reduced effect) usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Honda CM 250 C brings 17 hp, while the MuZ ETZ 251 (reduced effect) counters with 17 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: