Honda CM 400 T (reduced effect) vs Honda Shadow Classic 400 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Honda CM 400 T (reduced effect)stacks up against the Honda Shadow Classic 400. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Honda CM 400 T (reduced effect) | Honda Shadow Classic 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1983 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 395 cc | 398 cc |
| Horsepower | 27 hp | 31 hp |
| Torque | — | 33 Nm |
| Seat height | — | 26 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.5 L | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Two-piston calipers, hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 3.50-18 / 4.60-16 | 120/90-17 / 160/80-15 |
Honda CM 400 T (reduced effect) vs Honda Shadow Classic 400 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Honda CM 400 T (reduced effect) and the Honda Shadow Classic 400 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Honda CM 400 T (reduced effect) brings 27 hp, while the Honda Shadow Classic 400 counters with 31 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: