Husaberg FS 400 E vs Husqvarna SM 400 R (2003)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husaberg FS 400 Estacks up against the Husqvarna SM 400 R. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husaberg FS 400 E | Husqvarna SM 400 R |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2003 | 2002 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 399 cc | 400 cc |
| Weight | 112 kg | 118 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.4 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 120/70-17 / 150/60-17 |
Husaberg FS 400 E vs Husqvarna SM 400 R — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husaberg FS 400 E and the Husqvarna SM 400 R usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husaberg FS 400 E brings its published horsepower in a 112 kg package, while the Husqvarna SM 400 R counters with its own power figure at 118 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: