Husaberg TE 300 vs Husqvarna WR300 (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husaberg TE 300stacks up against the Husqvarna WR300. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husaberg TE 300 | Husqvarna WR300 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 293 cc | 293 cc |
| Weight | 103 kg | 107 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 39 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.8 L | 2.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Brake calipers on floating bearings | Single disc. Wave disc. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Brake calipers on floating bearings | Single disc. Floating disc. |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 |
Husaberg TE 300 vs Husqvarna WR300 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husaberg TE 300 and the Husqvarna WR300 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husaberg TE 300 brings its published horsepower in a 103 kg package, while the Husqvarna WR300 counters with its own power figure at 107 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: