Husqvarna 240 WR vs Mikilon CD250C (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna 240 WRstacks up against the Mikilon CD250C. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna 240 WR | Mikilon CD250C |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1986 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 239 cc | 245 cc |
| Horsepower | 17 hp | 13 hp |
| Torque | — | 18 Nm |
| Weight | — | 108 kg |
| Seat height | — | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.3 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.00-21 / 5.00-18 | 70/70-or19 / 90/0-or16 |
Husqvarna 240 WR vs Mikilon CD250C — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna 240 WR and the Mikilon CD250C usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna 240 WR brings 17 hp, while the Mikilon CD250C counters with 13 hp at 108 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: