Husqvarna 240 WR vs Mikilon CD250D-1 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna 240 WRstacks up against the Mikilon CD250D-1. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna 240 WR | Mikilon CD250D-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 1986 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 239 cc | 245 cc |
| Horsepower | 17 hp | 13 hp |
| Torque | — | 18 Nm |
| Weight | — | 108 kg |
| Seat height | — | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.3 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.00-21 / 5.00-18 | 70/100-19 / 90/100-16 |
Husqvarna 240 WR vs Mikilon CD250D-1 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna 240 WR and the Mikilon CD250D-1 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna 240 WR brings 17 hp, while the Mikilon CD250D-1 counters with 13 hp at 108 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: