Husqvarna CR50 vs Husqvarna SM50 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna CR50stacks up against the Husqvarna SM50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna CR50 | Husqvarna SM50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 43 kg | 43 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | 27 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | 0.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control |
| Tires | 60/100-12 / 2.75-10 | 90/90-10 / 90/90-10 |
Husqvarna CR50 vs Husqvarna SM50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna CR50 and the Husqvarna SM50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna CR50 brings its published horsepower in a 43 kg package, while the Husqvarna SM50 counters with its own power figure at 43 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: