Husqvarna SM 400 R vs CCM R45 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna SM 400 Rstacks up against the CCM R45. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna SM 400 R | CCM R45 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2002 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 400 cc | 443 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 40 hp |
| Weight | 118 kg | 128 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 3.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Bremo |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. bremo |
| Tires | 120/70-17 / 150/60-17 | 120/70-17 / 150/70-17 |
Husqvarna SM 400 R vs CCM R45 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna SM 400 R and the CCM R45 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna SM 400 R brings its published horsepower in a 118 kg package, while the CCM R45 counters with 40 hp at 128 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: