Husqvarna SM 400 R vs Praga SM 430 (2003)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna SM 400 Rstacks up against the Praga SM 430. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna SM 400 R | Praga SM 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2002 | 2003 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 400 cc | 427 cc |
| Torque | — | 33 Nm |
| Weight | 118 kg | 116 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 37 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 2.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-17 / 150/60-17 | 120/70-17 / 160/60-17 |
Husqvarna SM 400 R vs Praga SM 430 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna SM 400 R and the Praga SM 430 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna SM 400 R brings its published horsepower in a 118 kg package, while the Praga SM 430 counters with its own power figure at 116 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: