Husqvarna SM 610 R vs Husqvarna 610 TE (2000)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna SM 610 Rstacks up against the Husqvarna 610 TE. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna SM 610 R | Husqvarna 610 TE |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2000 | 1992 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 577 cc | 577 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 50 hp |
| Weight | 118 kg | — |
| Seat height | 35 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 90/90-21 / 140/90-18 |
Husqvarna SM 610 R vs Husqvarna 610 TE — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna SM 610 R and the Husqvarna 610 TE usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna SM 610 R brings its published horsepower in a 118 kg package, while the Husqvarna 610 TE counters with 50 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: