Husqvarna SM 610 S vs Husqvarna LT 610 E (2004)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna SM 610 Sstacks up against the Husqvarna LT 610 E. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna SM 610 S | Husqvarna LT 610 E |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2004 | 2001 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 576 cc | 576 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 50 hp |
| Weight | — | 149 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.4 L | 4.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-17 / 150/60-17 | — |
Husqvarna SM 610 S vs Husqvarna LT 610 E — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna SM 610 S and the Husqvarna LT 610 E usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna SM 610 S brings its published horsepower, while the Husqvarna LT 610 E counters with 50 hp at 149 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: