Husqvarna WR125 vs Mikilon CD125A (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR125stacks up against the Mikilon CD125A. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR125 | Mikilon CD125A |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 6 hp |
| Torque | — | 8 Nm |
| Weight | 101 kg | 65 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 0.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 120/90-18 | 2.50-14 / 3.00-12 |
Husqvarna WR125 vs Mikilon CD125A — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR125 and the Mikilon CD125A usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR125 brings its published horsepower in a 101 kg package, while the Mikilon CD125A counters with 6 hp at 65 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: