Husqvarna WR300 vs KTM 300 MXC (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR300stacks up against the KTM 300 MXC. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR300 | KTM 300 MXC |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2005 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 293 cc | 293 cc |
| Weight | 107 kg | 101 kg |
| Seat height | 39 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.5 L | 2.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Floating disc. | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | — |
Husqvarna WR300 vs KTM 300 MXC — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR300 and the KTM 300 MXC usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR300 brings its published horsepower in a 107 kg package, while the KTM 300 MXC counters with its own power figure at 101 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: