Husqvarna WR300 vs KTM 300 MXC USA (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR300stacks up against the KTM 300 MXC USA. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR300 | KTM 300 MXC USA |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2004 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 293 cc | 293 cc |
| Weight | 107 kg | 96 kg |
| Seat height | 39 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.5 L | 2.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Floating disc. | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | — |
Husqvarna WR300 vs KTM 300 MXC USA — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR300 and the KTM 300 MXC USA usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR300 brings its published horsepower in a 107 kg package, while the KTM 300 MXC USA counters with its own power figure at 96 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: