Husqvarna WR 50 vs Gilera H@K 50 (2002)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR 50stacks up against the Gilera H@K 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR 50 | Gilera H@K 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2002 | 2002 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 92 kg | 96 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 33 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.0 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 110/80-18 | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 |
Husqvarna WR 50 vs Gilera H@K 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR 50 and the Gilera H@K 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR 50 brings its published horsepower in a 92 kg package, while the Gilera H@K 50 counters with its own power figure at 96 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

