Husqvarna WR 50 vs Rockford Tora (2002)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR 50stacks up against the Rockford Tora. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR 50 | Rockford Tora |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2002 | 1974 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 58 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 6 hp |
| Torque | — | 0 Nm |
| Weight | 92 kg | 63 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.0 L | 1.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 110/80-18 | — |
Husqvarna WR 50 vs Rockford Tora — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR 50 and the Rockford Tora usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR 50 brings its published horsepower in a 92 kg package, while the Rockford Tora counters with 6 hp at 63 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: