Husqvarna WR250 vs KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR250stacks up against the KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR250 | KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Weight | 107 kg | 106 kg |
| Seat height | 39 mm | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.5 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Floating disc. | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | 80/100-21 / 100/90-19 |
Husqvarna WR250 vs KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR250 and the KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR250 brings its published horsepower in a 107 kg package, while the KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days counters with its own power figure at 106 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: