Husqvarna WR250 vs Mikilon D71-250 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Husqvarna WR250stacks up against the Mikilon D71-250. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Husqvarna WR250 | Mikilon D71-250 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 17 hp |
| Weight | 107 kg | — |
| Seat height | 39 mm | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.5 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Floating disc. | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 140/80-18 | 80/100-21 / 110/90-18 |
Husqvarna WR250 vs Mikilon D71-250 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Husqvarna WR250 and the Mikilon D71-250 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Husqvarna WR250 brings its published horsepower in a 107 kg package, while the Mikilon D71-250 counters with 17 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: