Hyosung Rush 50 vs Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Hyosung Rush 50stacks up against the Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Hyosung Rush 50 | Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 88 kg | 100 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Shuricane front disc brake with radial dual piston |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 120/90-12 | 120/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Hyosung Rush 50 vs Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade — which should you buy?
Picking between the Hyosung Rush 50 and the Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Hyosung Rush 50 brings its published horsepower in a 88 kg package, while the Peugeot Speedfight 3 Iceblade counters with its own power figure at 100 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: