Hyosung Rush 50 vs Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Hyosung Rush 50stacks up against the Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Hyosung Rush 50 | Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 88 kg | 90 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 2.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 120/90-12 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Hyosung Rush 50 vs Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties — which should you buy?
Picking between the Hyosung Rush 50 and the Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Hyosung Rush 50 brings its published horsepower in a 88 kg package, while the Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties counters with its own power figure at 90 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: