Hyosung SF 50 vs Kymco Vitality 50 2T (2006)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Hyosung SF 50stacks up against the Kymco Vitality 50 2T. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Hyosung SF 50 | Kymco Vitality 50 2T |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2006 | 2006 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 7 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | — | 5 Nm |
| Weight | 88 kg | 97 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 100/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Hyosung SF 50 vs Kymco Vitality 50 2T — which should you buy?
Picking between the Hyosung SF 50 and the Kymco Vitality 50 2T usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Hyosung SF 50 brings 7 hp in a 88 kg package, while the Kymco Vitality 50 2T counters with 4 hp at 97 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: