Ice Bear 150-19N Trike vs UM Max 150 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ice Bear 150-19N Trikestacks up against the UM Max 150. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ice Bear 150-19N Trike | UM Max 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 150 cc |
| Horsepower | 8 hp | — |
| Torque | 9 Nm | — |
| Weight | 161 kg | 112 kg |
| Seat height | 22 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.8 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 270/30-14 | 2.75-18 / 3.00-18 |
Ice Bear 150-19N Trike vs UM Max 150 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ice Bear 150-19N Trike and the UM Max 150 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ice Bear 150-19N Trike brings 8 hp in a 161 kg package, while the UM Max 150 counters with its own power figure at 112 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: