Ice Bear Cyclone 150 Trike vs WSK M21W2B Kobuz (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ice Bear Cyclone 150 Trikestacks up against the WSK M21W2B Kobuz. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ice Bear Cyclone 150 Trike | WSK M21W2B Kobuz |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 1977 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 174 cc |
| Horsepower | 8 hp | 14 hp |
| Torque | 9 Nm | 16 Nm |
| Weight | 160 kg | 112 kg |
| Seat height | 28 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 3.4 L | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 205/50-10 | 3.00-18 / 3.00-18 |
Ice Bear Cyclone 150 Trike vs WSK M21W2B Kobuz — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ice Bear Cyclone 150 Trike and the WSK M21W2B Kobuz usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ice Bear Cyclone 150 Trike brings 8 hp in a 160 kg package, while the WSK M21W2B Kobuz counters with 14 hp at 112 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: