Ice Bear R2 vs Lem CX3 (2006)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ice Bear R2stacks up against the Lem CX3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ice Bear R2 | Lem CX3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2006 | 2006 |
| Price | $4,550 | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 12 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 2 Nm |
| Weight | 41 kg | 45 kg |
| Seat height | 24 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.8 L | 0.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 1-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | — | 2.50-14 / 3.00-12 |
Ice Bear R2 vs Lem CX3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ice Bear R2 and the Lem CX3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ice Bear R2 brings 12 hp in a 41 kg package, while the Lem CX3 counters with 3 hp at 45 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: