Ice Bear R2 vs Lem CXF 3 (2006)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ice Bear R2stacks up against the Lem CXF 3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ice Bear R2 | Lem CXF 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2006 | 2006 |
| Price | $4,550 | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 12 hp | 4 hp |
| Weight | 41 kg | 45 kg |
| Seat height | 24 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.8 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 1-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | — | 2.50-10 / 2.75-10 |
Ice Bear R2 vs Lem CXF 3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ice Bear R2 and the Lem CXF 3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ice Bear R2 brings 12 hp in a 41 kg package, while the Lem CXF 3 counters with 4 hp at 45 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: