K2O Cento 25 vs Kreidler RMC-G 125 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the K2O Cento 25stacks up against the Kreidler RMC-G 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | K2O Cento 25 | Kreidler RMC-G 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2011 |
| Price | $1,899 | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 12 hp | 8 hp |
| Torque | 11 Nm | — |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 100/80-16 / 120/80-16 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
K2O Cento 25 vs Kreidler RMC-G 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the K2O Cento 25 and the Kreidler RMC-G 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the K2O Cento 25 brings 12 hp, while the Kreidler RMC-G 125 counters with 8 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: