Kasinski Soft 50 vs Giantco Bud (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kasinski Soft 50stacks up against the Giantco Bud. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kasinski Soft 50 | Giantco Bud |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 90 kg | 82 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 |
Kasinski Soft 50 vs Giantco Bud — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kasinski Soft 50 and the Giantco Bud usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kasinski Soft 50 brings 4 hp in a 90 kg package, while the Giantco Bud counters with 3 hp at 82 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: