Kasinski Soft 50 vs Peugeot V-Clic 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kasinski Soft 50stacks up against the Peugeot V-Clic 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kasinski Soft 50 | Peugeot V-Clic 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Weight | 90 kg | 79 kg |
| Seat height | — | 28 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 1.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 |
Kasinski Soft 50 vs Peugeot V-Clic 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kasinski Soft 50 and the Peugeot V-Clic 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kasinski Soft 50 brings 4 hp in a 90 kg package, while the Peugeot V-Clic 50 counters with 3 hp at 79 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: