Keeway ARN 150 vs UM Matrix 150 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway ARN 150stacks up against the UM Matrix 150. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway ARN 150 | UM Matrix 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 150 cc |
| Horsepower | 10 hp | 10 hp |
| Torque | — | 10 Nm |
| Weight | 105 kg | 102 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Keeway ARN 150 vs UM Matrix 150 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway ARN 150 and the UM Matrix 150 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway ARN 150 brings 10 hp in a 105 kg package, while the UM Matrix 150 counters with 10 hp at 102 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: