Keeway ARN 50 vs PGO TR3-50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway ARN 50stacks up against the PGO TR3-50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway ARN 50 | PGO TR3-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 104 kg | 124 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 6.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Keeway ARN 50 vs PGO TR3-50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway ARN 50 and the PGO TR3-50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway ARN 50 brings 4 hp in a 104 kg package, while the PGO TR3-50 counters with 3 hp at 124 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: