Keeway ARN 50 vs Qlink Rave 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway ARN 50stacks up against the Qlink Rave 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway ARN 50 | Qlink Rave 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 104 kg | 77 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Keeway ARN 50 vs Qlink Rave 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway ARN 50 and the Qlink Rave 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway ARN 50 brings 4 hp in a 104 kg package, while the Qlink Rave 50 counters with 3 hp at 77 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: