Keeway ARN 50 vs Tank Sports Urban 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway ARN 50stacks up against the Tank Sports Urban 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway ARN 50 | Tank Sports Urban 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 2 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 104 kg | 88 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 3.00-10 / 3.00-10 |
Keeway ARN 50 vs Tank Sports Urban 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway ARN 50 and the Tank Sports Urban 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway ARN 50 brings 4 hp in a 104 kg package, while the Tank Sports Urban 50 counters with 2 hp at 88 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: