Keeway Hacker 50 vs Beta Ark AC Paddock (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway Hacker 50stacks up against the Beta Ark AC Paddock. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway Hacker 50 | Beta Ark AC Paddock |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 115 kg | 88 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Keeway Hacker 50 vs Beta Ark AC Paddock — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway Hacker 50 and the Beta Ark AC Paddock usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway Hacker 50 brings its published horsepower in a 115 kg package, while the Beta Ark AC Paddock counters with its own power figure at 88 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: